|
|
|
|
Poverty Alleviation
Reports on
macroeconomics show that poverty in Pakistan has increased over the
last decade. Governmental and non- Governmental agencies, both
within Pakistan and outside, acknowledge that poverty is a multiplex
issue, encompassing as it does economics, health, education, social
status, employment and access to opportunities. The task of
alleviating poverty is equally complex. People experience poverty
both in relative and absolute terms: they also move into and out of
poverty at various times and under various conditions. Gender also
affects the experience of poverty, with women facing numerous
structural impediments to improving their situation.
Poverty
alleviation strategies and programmes aim at:
-
increasing
people's access to goods, services and opportunities;
-
increasing
people's ability to withstand the socio-economic shocks entailed in
job loss, crop failure and illness,
-
and expanding
the horizon of opportunities for improving the quality of life of
the poor.
PIPHRO can point
to the pooling of resources through social mobilization, income
generation, accumulated savings, asset creation, the establishment
of profitable enterprises, the creation of reliable and profitable
links to the market, capacity building for better access to
employment, reduced costs in health and the provision of educational
services where they did not exist previously, as its most
significant contributions to poverty alleviation.
Since PIPHRO
believes in a participatory approach, we ask people to define
poverty in their own terms and to let PIPHRO know what they need in
order to reduce it. The participatory wealth ranking exercise begins
with asking the residents of the geographical area selected for
programme: "what is poverty" and "how do you, as local residents,
understand the indicators of economic status here in your
community?" People usually define poverty in relation to the factors
that lead to increasing or reducing the economic standards of local
people. Productive landholding is one of the major indicators that
people consider for determining the economic status, but it is not
the only one. In some places, the availability of water is more
important than the size of landholdings. In other areas, people see
living conditions - the type of house, ownership of other assets
such as livestock, tube-wells and tractors - as the major
indicators. For areas with urban features, people identify economic
status according to the type of profession: for example, people
belonging to low-status professions (cobblers, barbers and
carpenters, for example) are considered to be poor. Labourers with
irregular and uncertain incomes, including labourers with
seasonally-fluctuating incomes, are considered the poorest amongst
income earners. Those people unable to earn at all (the destitute,
the aged, the physically or developmentally handicapped) constitute
a special case for poverty identification and alleviation programmes.
|
|